Research basis

Why Life Dojo focuses on skilled newcomers, networks, and measurable mentorship.

Life Dojo is not built around a vague idea that “mentorship is nice.” It is built around a specific career-mobility gap: capable people often have skills, but lack trusted local guidance, field-specific context, and networks.

Product implication

The app should prove guidance became action.

That is why Life Dojo tracks session completion, resume updates, mock interviews, referrals, interviews, job offers, and confidence before/after mentorship.

Design choices based on the problem

Verified mentor review before public listing
Request-before-message instead of open spammy messaging
AI used for session preparation, not replacing mentors
Session reflections and outcome tracking for measurable pilots
Trust boundaries: no legal, immigration, licensing, financial, or guaranteed employment advice

What still needs validation

The research supports the problem. The next proof must come from users: do students complete sessions, do senseis stay active, and do partners see measurable value from a small cohort?

Discuss a pilot cohort